Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

Netflix feels much better. . .


"Dumbest idea since New Coke, Qwikster, is aborted. Go, #Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, and be stupid no more. (That was strike 2, by the way.)"

Above is a tweet posted by me on October 10. I'd like to expand on it a bit here.

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings did the first smart thing he's done since his ham-handed summer price increase announcement when he smothered the idiotically named Qwikster in it's cradle. My earlier post on this subject highlights only a few of the reasons this was a moronic idea, so I won't rehash. Appletv

This move will do little to change the minds of customers and shareholders who have railed against and deserted Netflix in the past few months. But it should at least serve as a pressure dressing on the self-inflicted wound.

Personally, I have thought all along that one DVD at a time and all the streaming I can eat for about 16 bucks a month is a pretty darn good value. My wife, in recovery from a recent surgery, has probably gotten two months of value from the streaming in the last two weeks.

The most concerning thing to me about the lasting effects of this debacle is that Netflix will be handcuffed for quite some time to come in terms of making needed price increases to the streaming service. Sorry to splash a cold bucket of reality on you kids, but for the streaming catalog to grow as it needs to, the cost has got to go up sometime. Did you see what they had to pay for "Mad Men?" That's only one show, and one I'm not even that crazy about. How much do you think it will cost to get most of your favorite shows and mine? Mark my words. Either the price will go up or there will be a tiered subscription service sometime down the line.

Also, I can't imagine ISP's will continue indefinitely to carry all that streaming traffic on their backbones without either bandwidth caps for subscribers or extracting additional fees from Netflix. That's another cost that will eventually have to get passed on to us one way or another.

With Netflix licking it's public relations wounds, the next price increase is surely a lo-o-o-o-ong way off, which is a good thing for us consumers. I just hope Netflix doesn't run itself into the ground because it can't price itself reasonably in the face of pressure from ISP's and pressure from subscribers to not let the streaming library stagnate.

"Bring out yer dead!"


Earlier this week, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, recognizing he was in a public relations hole after a recent price increase, doggedly continued to dig deeper by arrogantly "explaining" his past arrogance just before dropping the bomb that the iconic DVD by mail service, along with it's website and billing accounts, would be spun off and given a really stupid name.Appletv

Somehow, Hastings managed to shoot himself in the foot even while that very same foot was jammed in his mouth. "You vill use Kvikster and you vill LIKE it."

All this reminds me of a scene from "Monty Python and the Holy Grail," one of the many, MANY movies NOT available for streaming at netflix.com.

In the comedy classic, the "Dead Collector" is pulling a cart door-to-door calling, "Bring out yer dead!" A man brings out his grandfather and places him on the cart, but the sickly old guy protests weakly that he's not yet dead.

Nearly Dead Man: I don't want to go on the cart.

Large Man: Oh, don't be such a baby.

The Dead Collector: I can't take him.

Nearly Dead Man: I feel fine.

Large Man: Oh, do me a favor.

The Dead Collector: I can't.

Large Man: Well, can you hang around for a couple of minutes? He won't be long.


Tech pundits on at least one podcast I've listened to liken the separation of the DVD and streaming businesses to housing one's sickly, nearly dead uncle up in the attic out of sight and mind until he expires.

That Netflix is doing this is understandable. DVD's are dying and Netflix wants to concentrate on the business of the future - streaming. DVD's are already under one layer of obsolescence since the advent of Blu-Ray. But the weak market uptake of this newer format makes even Blu-Ray look pretty diseased and arthritic.

Add to that the fact the DVD side of the Netflix business depends heavily on a healthy United States Postal Service. This once rock-solid government entity now can't seem to get through a fiscal year without racking up a multi-billion dollar loss and having to go hat-in-hand it's governmental parents for a bailout. Continued healthy function of the United States Postal Service will almost certainly depend on immediate positive and constructive action by the United States Congress, an institution famously disinclined toward any action not facilitating immediate short term and shortsighted partisan gain.

This seems similar to when Steve Jobs of Apple unilaterally, and somewhat prematurely, declared the floppy disk dead. History did vindicate his view eventually, but floppies still survived (much as DVD's will) a fair amount of time before succumbing to another now-dead storage medium, the Zip disk.

Netflix clearly thinks the DVD is dead, and I tend to agree. Any physical media I buy comes to me only after an exhaustive and fruitless search for any kind of download option. With music, if iTunes or Amazon doesn't have an mP3 or AAC file available, I sigh heavily and grudgingly schlep to Amazon or Best Buy to purchase a shrink-wrapped plastic disc. Once in hand, the disc is then be shoved into my Mac's optical drive for about 4 minutes and, once it's content was slurped into iTunes, the still shiny round coaster, er, disc, is then be tossed into an out-of-the-way drawer where it molders yet today, never since touched by human hands.

The Dead Collector: 'Ere, he says he's not dead.

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings: Yes he is.

The DVD: I'm not.

The Dead Collector: He isn't.

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings: Well, he will be soon, he's very ill.

The DVD: I'm getting better. . .


My wife and I have a modest collection of DVD's that has in the last half-decade only grown by a very few "uber favorites," the ones we definitely want available to watch right when the mood strikes us, such as the Christmas favorites "It's a Wonderful Life" and "A Christmas Story," and the Star Wars movies. (And even these few DVD's were purchased used.) For all else, internet streaming or a delivery of a disc by snail mail is more than adequate.

The HUGE downside to this de-integration of the DVD-by-mail/streaming business for both Netflix and it's users is that current search and rating system will now be fragmented, causing the recommendation engine that has surfaced to many great movies I would not have found otherwise to only recommend from the much smaller pool of streaming moves. No longer will I be able to just search for a movie on streaming, and in the all-too-frequent instance that it is not available for streaming, pop it in the DVD queue.

I was really easy-going about the effective rise in the price of the Netflix DVD and streaming package, as it was still several dollars below my "bargain line." But if I now have to deal with two separate entities for DVD's and streaming, especially when one of them has the totally idiotic name of "Qwikster," Netflix MUST expand their streaming options with massive new content deals, and SOON. Otherwise, shedding the DVD business will be a shot squarely in the foot. Once the separation is complete, I will still go to Netflix first for streaming, but instead of staying on the Netflix site to put a DVD in the queue, I will have to leave them to check out other streaming and DVD offerings. There are a few others now, such as iTunes rentals and Amazon prime, and I'm sure the options will grow in the coming months and years. Netflix might have otherwise kept this marketshare longer if DVD's were still were still integral to it's business, thereby giving it more time to become an even more dominant player in streaming.

Maybe Netflix wants to sell the DVD enterprise? If so, why dress it up like a corpse and give it a dippy name?

Perhaps there is an opportunity for a third party to license the Netflix recommendation engine and incorporate it into an aggregator for different DVD and streaming services, similar to what is now done by Boxee.

Whatever happens, all I can say is, "Sorry, Netflix. I'd get that foot looked at by a doctor if I were you. . ."

Logan's Run - the original novel


Today's element of recovered childhood is "Logan's Run" - a science fiction novel I read mostly in time spent riding Bob Farmer's school bus #23 in about 1977. It is rare that I read a book more than once, but I am sure I've read this one at least three times.

This novel dates from 1967, during war protest/youth movement days. The premise is this: What if "Never trust anyone over 30" were carried to the nth degree, to the point that, in exchange for a life of luxury, hedonism and leisure, all citizens were required to turn themselves in for "sleep" (read as "dirt nap") at the age of 21? Logan is a DS (Deep Sleep) agent, a police officer whose job it is to enforce the age limit using a pistol which fires a very unique assortment of ammunition.

(If you've only seen the movie and are saying to yourself, "That's not how I remember it," you're probably remembering right, as the movie diverged considerably from the novel. The subsequent TV series strayed even farther from the source novel.)

Authors are William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson. Nolan (imdb.comwikipedia) has been prolific in the science fiction and horror literary genres and has several TV and movie screenplays to his credit, including a "Logan's Run" television series pilot. Nolan also produced two "Logan" sequel novels written without Johnson. Johnson's (imdb.com, wikipedia) credits seem to lie mostly in short stories and television, and he may be best known as writer of the debut episode of "Star Trek," titled "The Man Trap," which aired on Sept. 8, 1966. He also contributed eight "Twilight Zone" episodes. As of this writing both authors are still living and have surpassed their 80th birthdays.

I suspect this novel might have faded into obscurity had it not been rendered as a movie in 1976 and a perhaps mercifully short-lived TV series in 1977. I may address both of these in future posts. My copy of the book pictured here features art from the 1976 movie poster with likenesses of Michael York and Jenny Agutter as Logan and Jessica. This rather rare cover features tattered costumes reflective of the end of the movie, after the heroes had spent several days in the hostile land outside the city of domes. Another, more commonly-seen cover showed them in "pristine" costumes.

The novel is much more expansive in setting than the movie, taking place in multiple cities and in the wilderness, and culminates in a space launch, unlike the movie which is set only in the single, nameless domed city and in the ruins of Washington DC. I don't want to give away much about the book since it is still worth a read whether or not you've seen the movie.

There has been an imdb.com entry for a movie remake of "Logan's Run" for several years. The project was once slated to star Leonardo DiCaprio. As of this writing, the entry lists a 2010 release date, but no cast is listed. The lack of a final cast in late 2009 makes it seem very unlikely we'll see a movie in '10. If anything, it seems this project has taken steps backward from actual production and release, though a truer cinematic representation of this book would be interesting.